The information recorded in the register is prima facie evidence of the matters contained in the register.

The information recorded in the register is prima facie evidence of the matters contained in the register.

• A. False
• B. True
• C. It depends on the case
• D. Only if the court approves

Answer: (B)

The key idea is that an official register is treated as evidence that can stand on its own. When information is recorded in the register, it is presumed to be true for purposes of proof in related proceedings. This means license status, names, addresses, and any disciplinary actions listed are considered evidence of those matters simply because they appear in the register. The strength of this presumption is that it streamlines proof: you can rely on the register to establish licensure or disciplinary history without needing to prove every detail separately. At the same time, this presumption isn’t absolute—someone can present other evidence to rebut or correct the record if it’s inaccurate or outdated. So the statement is true: the information in the register is prima facie evidence of what the register says it contains.

The key idea is that an official register is treated as evidence that can stand on its own. When information is recorded in the register, it is presumed to be true for purposes of proof in related proceedings. This means license status, names, addresses, and any disciplinary actions listed are considered evidence of those matters simply because they appear in the register. The strength of this presumption is that it streamlines proof: you can rely on the register to establish licensure or disciplinary history without needing to prove every detail separately. At the same time, this presumption isn’t absolute—someone can present other evidence to rebut or correct the record if it’s inaccurate or outdated. So the statement is true: the information in the register is prima facie evidence of what the register says it contains.